I saw the Wogan interview with David Icke. I was dismayed at Wogan; how he purposefully attempted to belittle and humiliate Icke. It continues to be fascinating how the mainstream will not touch him.
David Icke Exposes The Archon Conspiracy And The Crumbling Matrix:
Richie Allen talks about his experience of David Icke, Awaken at Wembey Arena 25.10.2014:
David Icke - Two Hour Special Royal/Political Paedophilia How the Global Pieces Fit:
Former British Intel Operative Andrea Davison, on the run for exposing child sex abuse:
It’s time for lawful rebellion against the Crown under Article 61 of the Magna Carta:
By The 'Consent of the Governed':
Icke persistently called out Lord McAlpine as a violator of children and no action was ever brought against Icke. Here he accuses George 'Daddy' Bush.
Ian R. Crane remind me of Icke and visa versa, though they do not seem to reference one another:
Apathy Kills - Part 1 - Brisbane Nov 2014
Apathy Kills - Part 2 - Brisbane Nov 2014
The David Icke Videocast: Paris - Who Benefits?
As Icke says, it is encouraging how many people are not accepting the official versions of these terrorist events.
25.01.2015 - David Icke Interview - Political & Royal Paedophillia, Cover Ups & Leon Brittan:
David Icke Interview 2 - Political & Royal Paedophillia, Cover Ups & Leon Brittan:
28.01.2015 - David Icke on offense.
So many people can’t see that they are being played off against each other so each keeps the other in line and in silence for fear of ‘offending’ someone, anyone. ‘You can’t say that about me or you’re racist’ – ‘and you can’t say that about me or you’re ‘anti-Semitic’ – ‘and you can’t say that about me or you are sexist, ageist, homophobic’ … and all the other labels in the ever-increasing list of ‘ists’ and ‘bics’.
Maybe I should coin the term ‘Ickeist’ given the daily abuse I have taken for decades for simply having a different angle on reality to the great majority. But then I don’t need to because the power to be offended or not offended lies not with the abuser but with the receiver of abuse.
If I am offended by the comments of idiots and hate-filled trolls then that is more a statement about me than them. They may be idiots and they may be hate-filled, but I would be allowing myself to be affected by the idiots and hate-filled – how crazy is that?
But PC madness has gone far beyond mere abuse and into the fairyland of censoring the innocuous and friendly ribbing and banter.
We have become a population not only incredibly easily offended – but also one allowing itself to be told what to be offended about by the professional censors and Thought Police appointed by the less-than-one-per-cent to constantly erode our freedom of expression and turn us against each other.
We forget at our peril and our children’s peril that freedom of expression includes people saying what we don’t like or agree with.
Does anyone really think that the slave-trade and mass-killing families in the global cabal manipulating, encouraging and legislating ‘Political Correctness’ could give a damn about what they consider the ‘lower races’ being offended about ANYTHING?
It is all to divide and rule us. And so far it’s working for so many – but it doesn’t have to.
It’s just a choice.
27.04.2014 - Are You Sure?
A letter to David Icke...
I've long appreciated your work. I've bought your books. I've seen your excellent talk live at Brixton Academy.
You seem to be regularly posting allegations of genocide by Turks against Armenians. Today, 27.04.2015, you have posted these at:
Why did Obama not recognize mass killings of Armenians as genocide?
WHY HAS TURKEY BEEN PROTECTED FOR 100 YEARS AGAINST ITS EVIL DEED:
I do not have to inform you regard to genocides, holocausts and the on-going finger pointing of who killed more than who... you have been questioning 'official' stories long before me.
However, when the Pope starts pointing a finger at Turks for an alleged Armenian Genocide, do you not suspect propaganda is being spouted? Rome gives even the British a run for their money in terms of invasion and slaughter down the years.
Israel pushes pushes pushes holocaust, yet appears to orchestrate race divide and apparent Palestinian culling... what about North American Indian genocide, Australian aborigine genocide, English culling in Africa, the alleged 10-12 million German soldiers left to starve in Eisenhower's camps at the end of WWII? How about the wiping out of Gnostic telesti by the Abrahamic cults as per John Lamb Lash's 'Not In His Image'. It goes on and on... the victors writes the history as ever.
I do not know - I wasn't there. I do have a relationship with Turkey and Turks and therefore, declare a bias. I do question whether the Armenian allegations are inaccurate. Were there perhaps 'false flag' killings to give the impression the Turks were doing it?
I am currently on p. 385 of Ataturk's Nutuk 'Great Speech'.
From Ataturk’s Nutuk 36 hour speech given 15-20 October 1927, there are passages relevant to the alleged Armenian ‘genocide’.
I write out as per the book and as the English translation is written. Of course, being these are the words of Atatürk, they risk the accusation of bias. My ‘feeling’ is Atatürk’s account is worthy of consideration.
Atatürk represented a National Assembly based out of Ankara. The established ‘Government’ represented the remnants of the Caliphate and Sultanate powers based in Istanbul. The ‘Government’ were considering compromise and appeasement with foreign forces while the National Assembly sought complete national independence.
“Gentleman! A communication from Istanbul on 19 February 1920 brought us the news that:
“The English diplomatic representative has verbally given definite information to the Government from the Foreign Office that the capital will be left to the Ottoman Empire, but at the same time, he has demanded that the Armenian massacres shall cease forthwith and that our operations against the Allied troops – including those of Greece – shall also cease immediately. He added if this were not done, our peace conditions would be altered…
Finally, did the Allied Powers entertain some doubt about the Government not succeeding in disbanding troops at the front which the national forces had sent into the occupied districts to oppose the forces of the enemy and put an end to the fight they carried on and the movement they made against them, and did they consequently plan to occupy Istanbul on the pretext that the Government could neither prevent the attacks against the Allied Powers (including the Greeks) nor put an end to the Armenian massacres – which, by the way, did not exist?
I believe that later events have shown that the last of these suggestions was the nearest of all to the truth. It was, however, noticeable that the Government, far from interpreting the proposal made by the English diplomatic representative in this light, had, on the contrary, founded their hopes on it.
Gentleman! In order to understand how ill-advised this proposal was, we shall recall certain phases of the situation as they presented themselves at the time. The assertions regarding the Armenians massacres were undoubtedly not in accordance with fact. For the Armenians in the south, armed by foreign troops and encouraged by the protection they enjoyed, attacked the Muslims of their district.
Animated by the spirit of revenge, they pursued a relentless policy of murder and extermination everywhere. This was responsible for the tragic incident at Maras (note: sounds like Marash). Making common cause with the foreign troops, the Armenians had completely destroyed an old Muslim town like Maras by their artillery and machine-gun fire.
They killed thousands of innocent and defenceless women and children. The Armenians were the instigators of the atrocities, which were unique in history. The Muslims had merely offered resistance and had defended themselves with the object of saving their lives and their honour. The telegram which the Americans, who had remained in the town with the Muslims during the five days that the massacres continued, had sent to their representatives in Isanbul, clearly indicates in an indisputable manner who were the originators of this tragedy.
Threatened by the bayonets of the Armenians, who were armed to the teeth, the Muslims in the Vilayet of Adana were at that time in danger of being annihilated. While this policy of oppression and annihilation carried on against the Muslims, who were only trying to save their lives and their independence, was liable to attract the attention of the civilised world and excite their commiseration, how could the denials or the proposal made to us to abandon the attitude attributed to us be taken seriously?”
The truth? It’s apparently both allusive and right in front of our faces, if we wish to see it. It seems the old status quo based upon war, foreign entanglement, a corrupt fractional financial system and unfathomable child violation, is crumbling just as the Ottoman Empire did. I am a little surprised you seem to be taking sides when the evidence is not clear to me. Just a thought. I love your work, yet on this occasion raise a question or two. No doubt I risk the wrath of the Armenian lobby by doing so.
Ataturk stated: Yurtta Baris, Dunyada Baris - Peace At Home, Peace In The World.
I aspire to that message. I painted at Ataturk's mausoleum 20-22 April culminating in a paint-in with kids on 23 April, a day that Ataturk bequeathed as Children's Day:
I wasn't there, so I don't know, but you of all people David have been a standard bearer to checking the truth above the official nonsense. I felt it worth an e-mail. I shall send this to TAP blog too.
As a wag once said,
‘The artist must go very far, so that the ordinary man will go far enough. Arsenal!’
10.09.2015 - Patrick Henningson with David Icke:
16.09.2015 - David Icke On Jeremy Corbyn, Syria And The Reality Behind The Refugees Crisis And More?
17.10.2015 - The Empire Strikes Back On VIP Paedophilia - The David Icke Videocast:
05.12.2015 - Icke just makes me laugh. The Climate Change Scam, What's it really all about? The David Icke Videocast:
01.02.2016 - Is this bollocks or does it touch upon some poignant points? The Coleman Experience on Terry Wogan:
"In 2013 he made the following claims:
” Veteran TV and radio legend Sir Terry Wogan has spoken of his hatred of Jimmy Savile and how his crimes were an open secret at the BBC.
The 75-year-old broadcaster has told of how he despised Savile and how his horrific legacy of child abuse has “poisoned” the BBC.
He said: “He always struck me as creepy. I’ve talked to people and not one of them has said: ‘I really liked him.’”
The Children in Need host recalled a celebrity lunch with journalists revealing that it was common knowledge in the industry what Savile was up to.
“I was sitting at a table having lunch and Savile was sitting one up from me, and also up from me was Jean Rook (the legendary columnist)
“And Jimmy Savile got up to go to the loo, and she looked across at me and said: ‘When are they going to expose him?’
And I said ‘that’s your job.’ And nobody ever did, even though everyone had heard the rumours.
“This whole Savile thing has poisoned everything.”
There have been many suspicious deaths at the BBC, most notably that of Jill Dando
Terry Wogan: “Looks Like David Icke Was Right All Along”:
A repentant Terry Wogan has spoken of his distress at ridiculing researcher and writer David Icke all those years ago.
“I ridiculed someone who was in the process of waking up. You see I was asleep myself just as so many others were. Well, I apologise to Mr Icke unreservedly for being a snivelling arse that night on the Wogan show. David Icke was correct on Jimmy Savile and all the others, especially those in the halls of power,” Mr Wogan told the BBC news service.
02.02.2016 - David Icke Reflects On That 1991 Interview With The Late Sir Terry Wogan:
27.02.2016 - OUT! -The David Icke Videocast Trailer:
The following quote is attributed to Jean Monnet:
"Europe’s nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation."
03.03.2016 - David Camoron Incredibly Cites Ex BBC David Icke.
Camoron says: "Of course you can say this is all some giant conspiracy, some sort of David Icke's style sort of you know ... It is just nonsense".
Can you believe Camoron is actually citing Icke?!
Hey Dave, what about Icke pointing a huge finger at McAlpine, Leon & co?! No legal action? Wonder why?!
Here it is, about 7.40 mins in, David 'oink oink' Camoron actually refres to David Icke conspiracy:
It is quite bizarre. It's lovely.
David Icke - 9/11 Was An Inside Job:
07.08.2016 - David Icke on Edge Radio, Auckland, New Zealand:
David Icke 2016 - David Icke Live in Melbourne:
David Icke, Dealing With Anger and Frustration:
06.12.2016 - The Cruellest Hoax, Israel's Fake History:
09.12.2016 - Pizzagate, The Context - The David Icke Videocast Trailer
04.04.2017 - Politician On Censorship, Evictions, Puppet Parliaments & How David Icke's Books Inspired His Party: